Author |
Jennie Helmer |
Date |
2020-01-21 |
Reviewer |
- |
Edited |
2020-10-22 |
A call-taker receives a call for an unresponsive 68-year-old male. The call-taker, through using interactive video instruction, determines that the patient is unresponsive and not breathing. The call-taker begins video-CPR instructions to the caller, and the bystander begins CPR. The call-taker is able to visualize and correct the rate and hand-placement of the bystander.
“Does using interactive video instruction by Emergency Medical Call-Takers and Dispatchers better identify patients in cardiac arrest than without video?”
Population |
Patients presented to Call-Taker/Dispatcher as unconscious and not breathing |
Intervention |
Video-assisted CPR instructions |
Comparison |
Audio-only T-CPR instructions |
Outcome |
Bystander CPR quality |
Pubmed: ((“Cardiac Arrest”) OR (“Unresponsive”)) AND ((“EMD”) OR (“Call-Taker”) OR (“Dispatcher”)) AND ((“Video CPR Instructions” OR “Audio CPR Instructions”)) AND (“Bystander CPR”)
8 Results (4 Relevant) on 2020-01-21
Video-instructed CPR significantly improves the time to initiate compressions, the chest compression rate, and a trend for correctness of hand position was also observed, compared to the audio-instructed method.